Reflections on the Past Week
The lack of leadership of a body that’s being asked too much of isn’t good for the city. If we want a strong city council, we need to build it.
I was caught off guard. I didn’t see Council member Carlson changing his vote coming. Then again, I wasn’t expecting the Tampa Bay Times to send a reporter1 to the special call meeting and make public a letter the mayor sent to then Council Chair Maniscalco in March. A letter Maniscalco hadn’t shared with the rest of his council, even during the special call meeting. And truly, from a leadership standpoint, the chair didn’t do a very good job handling it. To this armchair QB, a chair should have immediately addressed the behavior issues with a blanket statement and a warning that any future behavior would be met with what ever consequences the rules and charter outline. As to the other part of the mayor’s letter, the “too many motions” stuff, that needs to be bifurcated and pushed back on some. Instead, there was an agenda item number 101 cryptically about decorum and efficiency that was danced around. That resulted in the equally cryptic special call meeting. So was this really about Maniscalco naming Carlson to the public safety committee, the police union raising an objection and Mansicalco reversing his decision2? Carlson said no. Maniscalco was convinced it was. And while I have no inside knowledge, I haven’t spoken to anyone on the subject, I believe on it’s own, no, it wasn’t the reason he flipped his vote. But if you don’t have conviction in your decisions to stand up to special interests, maybe a leadership spot isn’t where you belong.
We are demanding from 7 diverse elected people—who only recently started making $1400 a week—their 7 legislative aides already doing the work of 21 people, a single lawyer and a recently added budget analyst to be more than they can.
Will changing chairs miraculously make things better? Hell no. We are demanding from 7 diverse elected people—who only recently started making $1400 a week—7 legislative aides already doing the work of 21 people, a single lawyer and a recently added budget analyst to be more than they can. When council’s interests diverge from the mayor, we wind up in the situation we are in now. This government system might have worked when we were broke ass “America’s Next Great City”, but we’ve neglected it along with the sewer pipes.
If we want a strong, functioning co-equal branch of government in the City of Tampa we need to demand this and future councils act like one (the charter is very clear on the separation of powers but the words “strong mayor” do not appear in the text). And with that, it requires people. Chair Clendenin recently started a discussion around this topic in a broad sense. The charter does not preclude council from hiring additional staff. What would 7 even part-time research assistants and a paralegal require budget wise? Politicians aren’t inclined to spend money on themselves, see the battle over salary3, so it’s going to take enough people asking for it. Or we need to be realistic about our expectations of what Tampa City Council can do. Tallahassee is already doing their best to take the rest away.
Our stories may be republished online or in print under Creative Commons license CC BY-NC-ND 4.0. We ask that you edit only for style or to shorten, provide proper attribution and link to our website.